Paradigms of Personality Assessment: Psychodynamic

Wiggins, J. (2003). Paradigms of personality assessment. New York: Guilford Press. Read Chapters 1, 7, & 8 [—chapter 1; —chapter 8]

Bornstein, R. F. (2012). Rorschach score validation as a model for 21st-century personality assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 26-38.

Garb, H. N., Wood, J. M., Lilenfeld, S. O., Nezworski, M. T. (2005). Roots of the Rorschach controversy. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 97-118.Download Garb, H. N., Wood, J. M., Lilenfeld, S. O., Nezworski, M. T. (2005). Roots of the Rorschach controversy. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 97-118.

Lilienfeld, S. O., Wood, J. M., & Garb, H. N. (2000). Scientific status of projective techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1 (2), (Whole). Download Lilienfeld, S. O., Wood, J. M., & Garb, H. N. (2000). Scientific status of projective techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1 (2), (Whole). Also, see: https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/tat-commentaryLinks to an external site.

McGrath, R. E. (2008). The Rorschach in the context of performance-based personality assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 465-475.

Oswald, F. L., Mitchell, G., Blanton, H., Jaccard, J., Tetlock, P. E. (2013). Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: A meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,105, 171-192.Links to an external site.

Last updated