Clinical versus Actuarial (AI) Judgement and Diagnostics

Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgement. Science, 243, 1668-1674. Download Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgement. Science, 243, 1668-1674.

Grove, W. M., & Meehl, P. E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 293-323.

Hilton, N. Z., Harris, G. T., & Rice, M. E. (2006). Sixty-six years of research on the clinical versus actuarial prediction of violence. The Counseling Psychologist. 34, 400-409.

Grove, W. M., et al. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12, 19-30. Download Grove, W. M., et al. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12, 19-30.

Kleinmutz, B. (1990). Why we still use our heads instead of formulas: Toward an integrative approach. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 296-310.

McCauley, C. (1991). Selection of National Science Foundation graduate fellows: A case study of psychologists failing to apply what they know about decision making. American Psychologist, 46, 1287-1291.

Sawyer, J. (1966). Measurement and prediction: Clinical and statistical. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 178-200.

Youyou, W., Kosinski, M., & Stillwell, D. (2015). Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.